NSFW
I’ve been thinking about something lately and can’t quite settle on an answer. Every time people talk about AI-based image reconstruction tools, the conversation instantly turns into the NSFW side of things, and I get why, but it feels like we’re ignoring other potential uses. For example, restoring old family photos with damaged details, or fixing shots where lighting or angles completely ruined someone’s face. Has anyone here actually tried using these tools for something more constructive and not just the usual stuff? Curious to hear if that’s even realistic in practice.
Yeah, this topic comes up a lot, and honestly, people underestimate how flexible these models can be when you’re not forcing them into the same stereotype over and over. I’ve messed around with a bunch of tools, including what’s described here — Deepsukebe AI — mostly because I wanted to understand the tech, not because I needed the “other” functionality. The interesting part is that the reconstruction models underneath can actually help improve low-res photos, rebuild missing textures, and even fill in corrupted image regions. I tested it on a scan of an old picture of my grandfather, where half the face was basically noise from the scanner, and after some tweaking, the AI rebuilt a surprisingly close version of what the missing part should look like. Obviously, it's not perfect, and sometimes you get strange artifacts or the model makes confident but wrong assumptions, but for personal archiving it worked better than anything I tried before. So yeah, it’s absolutely possible to use these tools for something meaningful, but most people just never bother exploring that direction.
Interesting point. I haven’t tried those tools myself, but I’ve seen people use similar tech for restoring film frames or repairing shots from older digital cameras. So the idea doesn’t sound far-fetched at all. I guess it really depends on how much patience someone has when fine-tuning the output and not expecting magic