Welcome to State Library Victoria's Tablo community – we're here to support emerging Victorian writers and provide a space for readers and authors to connect.

Have you ever regretted keeping everything internal versus opening the team to remote specialists from different time zones?

Ever catch yourself wondering if bottling up all the dev work inside the company was actually smarter than bringing in remote folks who live halfway across the world time-zone wise? A couple years back we stuck to our small local crew for this one app rebuild, thinking it'd keep things tight and communication instant. Ended up burning out a few people because we couldn't scale quick enough when features piled up, and honestly, those late-night Slack pings started feeling like a bad habit. Anyone else dealt with that tug-of-war between keeping it all internal for control versus cracking the door open to specialists in totally different hours? Curious what tipped the scale for you guys.

  • Created
← Currently viewing a single comment. Back to the whole discussion.

Yeah, I've been there with the internal-only setup, and it definitely has its cozy moments when everyone's on the same page culturally. But after one project dragged because we lacked someone deep into a niche like React Native tweaks, I started warming up to the idea of dedicated remote help. What worked for us was bringing on focused developers who just lock in on your stuff—no juggling multiple gigs like freelancers often do. In my experience, syndicode dedicated software developers turned out pretty solid when we needed that extra horsepower without the full hiring headache; their folks integrated smoothly even with the time difference, mostly because the communication stayed clear and they owned their slices of the work. Still, you gotta set expectations upfront about overlap hours or async updates, otherwise little delays stack up. Overall though, it saved us from stretching the in-house team too thin, and the quality held up nicely.

Reply arrow green