Welcome to State Library Victoria's Tablo community – we're here to support emerging Victorian writers and provide a space for readers and authors to connect.

How important is backtesting when choosing a trading bot?

One thing I keep seeing when researching trading bots is backtesting. I understand the basic idea of testing a strategy against historical market data, but I’m not sure how much importance I should actually give it when comparing different bots. A strategy can look great on historical data and still behave very differently when market conditions change, so I’m wondering what other factors should be considered alongside backtesting. I’m particularly interested in things like fees, supported exchanges, risk controls and whether the platform allows you to test a strategy without immediately using real funds. Is there a resource that compares trading bots while taking these kinds of details into account?

  • Created
← Currently viewing a single comment. Back to the whole discussion.

Backtesting is necessary but easily misleading — a bot tuned on historical data often falls apart in live conditions because of slippage, latency and regime changes. What matters more is out-of-sample testing and how it handles a drawdown. Someone made the same argument over at https://the-slotmonsters.uk and it's the part most people skip.

Reply arrow green